skip to main content
CloseClose menu

Flyer 72 ALSV for GMV 1.1 Requirement

In 2012, the U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) announced that it was seeking proposals for a new lightweight tactical vehicle (designated GMV 1.1) to replace aging HMMWVs which were the standard wheeled vehicle used to transport troops throughout the U.S. military. These new vehicles would need to have significantly greater mobility capabilities than the HMMWV, as well as be able to support the latest generation C4ISR electronics, and provide for additional mounted firepower.

A number of manufacturers proposed vehicles to meet the GMV 1.1 Requirement, including the HMMWV’s incumbent OEM, AM General. In August 2013, the General Dynamics Flyer was announced as the winner, although two of the other finalists opted to file a protest, which was denied in late 2013, as well as one following up with a subsequent lawsuit, which was rejected by the courts in April 2014.

General Dynamics and Flyer have been successfully delivering vehicles to SOCOM for the past few years, and some of these vehicles have seen combat use.

About the Customer

U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) is the Unified Combatant Command which oversees all Special Operations Component Commands of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps.

The Challenges

Flyer 72 Vehicle Convoy

While the politics and realities of a number of OEMs offering potentially viable vehicles to meet SOCOM’s requirements may be seen as a given in a competitive industry, one of the primary challenges facing any lightweight vehicle manufacturer is striking a balance between performance and mobility and protection for the vehicle’s occupants. The reality remains that the more heavily armored a vehicle becomes, the more its mobility, range and other performance characteristics are degraded due to the weight of the armor. Vehicles designed to perform in demanding off-road terrain need to have reasonable ground clearance, along with generous approach and departure angles, and need robust suspension to handle their loads as well as the vagaries of uneven ground.

Features such as V-hulls, while offering superior protection from undercarriage blasts, are simply not compatible with significant off-road performance, and while the SOCOM vehicles have limited add-on armor kits, these are intended to provide modest ballistic and fragmentation protection from small arms fire, and not to defeat heavier caliber weapons, or anti-tank missiles, or even rocket propelled grenades.

This tension between mobility and protection is perhaps best evidenced by a January 2018 announcement that SOCOM had awarded a contract for “heavy duty turret assemblies” to be retrofit to Flyer vehicles, offering improved protection for a gunner or to allow integration of the Common Remotely Operated Weapons Station (CROWS).

The Solution

The Flyer 72 base vehicle was specially configured to meet the specific requirements of SOCOM, and in 2013 was announced as the winner of the Ground Mobility Vehicle competition, to replace HMMWVs in use by the organization. Under the initial contract, nearly 1,300 vehicles were ordered just to support SOCOM requirements.

Results

General Dynamics and Flyer Defense have been delivering vehicles ordered by SOCOM under the 2013 IDIQ contract, with vehicles produced out of a GDOTS facility located in Anniston, Alabama. Furthermore, in 2017, due to delays in its own GMV Program, the U.S. Army placed an order for an additional 300 vehicles in a 9-passenger “GMV” configuration, to be used to support 5 airborne infantry brigade combat teams.

Flyer Defense has successfully developed successive generations of a wheeled, highly mobile platform, available in two base chassis widths, which can be rapidly configured to support a variety of missions.

Learn More About the Flyer LineupLearn More About the Flyer Lineup